Showing posts with label two child policy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label two child policy. Show all posts

Thursday, November 5, 2015

China One Child Policy

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/29/asia/china-one-child-policy/


Who: Chinese government changes decades long policy enacted in 1980 to allow couples to have more than one kid.

What: Chinese Government allows couples to now have two children.

Where: China

When: Recently October 29th


The graphic shows the growing problem with aging in China.

Why: It impacts the country because this policy has been estimated to stop 400 million births, and now with all the new births that will happen it will populate china more.
China fears that there is an aging problem and it won't be as rich as they hope.


Democratic Values:

Liberty- These people should have the right to have as many kids as they want. That is a given right. However this is kind of deceiving because the one child policy is only being upgraded to a two child policy. China is still not allowing anyone to have more than two kids.

Equality- The One Child policy did not show any equality because there was still a way for people to have multiple kids. Their was a large criteria of these for the Chinese couples.



Bias: This article is biased in favor of China. The author of this CNN article is based in Beijing China so he is constantly influenced and surrounded by the Chinese culture.

Chris Guertler and Matt Dostie

Tuesday, November 3, 2015

China Ends One-Child Policy, Allowing Families Two Children

Chris Buckley, NY Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/30/world/asia/china-end-one-child-policy.html

Who? Chinese communist government (enacts policy), Chinese people (whom the policy effects)


What? China ended its infamous one child policy, now allowing two children. The policy was created by the communist regime in the late 1970’s to slow the population growth and increase economic prosperity. However, the policy has had negative repercussions such as a skewed sex ratio. Because boys are traditionally valued to girls, abortion and infanticide has occurred. In addition, the policy has created a growing population of elders.

Where: China


When: October 29, 2015


Why? According to the National Health and Family Planning Commission it was abolished in order to “increase labor supply and ease pressures from an aging population.” The author notes that about 10% of the population is over 65, and estimates say by 2035, it is likely to reach 20%. This is problematic in China because it is tradition for adults to take care of their elders. From an economic standpoint, the government hopes to replenish the national workforce.

May take many months for policy to take effect - must be refined by central government and implemented by the provisional government - it probably won’t take into affect until march of 2015


Reaction of people: After hearing the news most Chinese were not encouraged to have any more than one child anyway, or were indifferent on the topic. Because raising children is very expensive, many are reluctant to have more than one child.



Democratic Values:


Liberty: Under the one child policy, the people of China were unable to live without oppressive restrictions and limitations. The policy restricted the citizens’ ability to choose their desired number of children and oppressed those who disobeyed it under harsh fines, forced abortions, and home intrusions. In a sense, abolishing the policy and allowing two children is still a violation of the people’s liberty, as they are still limited in their freedom to reproduce.


Individual Rights: Although the people of china have gained the right to have two children, they still are restricted by by the child laws, which is an infringement on the people’s rights. No other countries control the people’s reproduction like the Chinese.

Common Good: Ideally, abolishing the policy would benefit the general good of the people, as it is increases individual freedom and is intended to decrease the generation gap between elders, which would allow for more elders to be taken care of. However, it ultimately may not, as many simply don’t have the economic and financial needs necessary to raise two children.  


Bias

The author uses harsh word choice when describing the actions of the Chinese government: “brutal intrusions involved, including forced abortions and crippling fines,” which could reveal his unfavorable opinion of the communist regime.

Visual:


















Isabelle Christie and Jackson Clarke